Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit TopJedi's column >>

TOPJEDI

Home Page
Imbedded Galactic News Journalist and Hyperspace Commentator
Articles Posted: 80  Links Seeded: 822
Member Since: 11/2005  Last Seen: 11/06/2010

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Shocking Audio: Rep. Dingell Says ObamaCare Will Eventually "Control the People"

Seeded on Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:25 AM EDT
Read Article
us-news, health-care, democrats, plan, obamacare, pelosi, control, reid, takeover, dingell
Seeded by TopJedi
Advertise | AdChoices

"It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps."

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • TopJedi's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: ≡ Just the Facts ≡, FOX NEWS, ObamaCare, Operation: Hearts and Minds
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (106)
TopJedi

Resistance is futile :P You will be assimilated!

LOL

  • 23 votes
#1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:27 AM EDT
rkymtnwoman

You will cooperate! Bend over.

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:39 AM EDT
Lkessler

And we thought the Borg was science fiction, TopJedi... :o

  • 9 votes
#1.2 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
Jack-467967

More than 86,000,000 million firearms in this country. Let em try. Excuse me, privately owned weapons. I would also say that a good deal of the military wouldn't stand up for a take over either.

  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:28 PM EDT
rickace

Lucy and TJ

Here's the borg :-)

Comrade Red Square delivers the goods once again.

  • 6 votes
#1.4 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:36 PM EDT
rickace

Jack-467967

More than 86,000,000 million firearms in this country. Let em try.

Alarmingly enough, they already tried and succeeded on at least two occasions. It's not just Obamacare controlling the people.

Blatant violations of people's rights under the Second and Fourth Amendments, perpetrated by conspiracies of federal agents and national guard troops.

Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina

Aftermath of an F5 tornado in Greensburg, Kansas.

How tragically ironic is it that the only friends of the people in Greensburg were charitable anarcho-communists?

  • 7 votes
#1.5 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:42 PM EDT
tweetheart44

rickace, Oh brother. Did the world come to a screeching halt because of these two isolated incidences? NO! Both took place after a natural disaster. See, the problem is that they had to go door to door to ask the people to leave. You continue to drive these examples into the ground. Obama doesn't want your crappy guns! Get over it.

Obamacare, it's called health care reform and it is now a law, thank God. Rick, aren't you missing your daily tea bagger meeting?

  • 6 votes
#1.6 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:00 PM EDT
Socrates1

What it's called and what it is are two completely different things. It never fails to amaze me how words are more important than deeds in so many cases.

  • 6 votes
#1.7 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:06 PM EDT
rickace

tweetheart44

Did the world come to a screeching halt because of these two isolated incidences?

Did I say it did?

See, the problem is that they had to go door to door to ask the people to leave.

And that gave them the right to violate rights protected by TWO amendments?

You continue to drive these examples into the ground.

And the government is wiping its ass with the Constitution. Any problem with that?????? Let's just tear the damned thing up already and anoint Obama king and Pelosi queen.

Obama doesn't want your crappy guns!

How the hell do you know that?

Obamacare, it's called health care reform and it is now a law, thank God.

LOL. Read #10.5 below. And do watch that vid of Dr. Price. Remember it when you go to visit your physician and receive your opportinity to get in line.

Rick, aren't you missing your daily tea bagger meeting?

Potty mouth.

  • 9 votes
#1.8 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:18 PM EDT
rickace

Socrates1

What it's called and what it is are two completely different things. It never fails to amaze me how words are more important than deeds in so many cases.

In an ironic way tweet is correct. She is clearly convinced that "reform" implies improvement of care. Yet all the bill must do to accomplish reform is to change things. We can expect exactly that: for patients it will be a change for the worse.

  • 9 votes
#1.9 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:22 PM EDT
Socrates1

Hmm.

  • 1 vote
#1.10 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:24 PM EDT
tweetheart44

1) You act like these two incidences is the beginning of your "wonderful world of guns" being taken away. Talk about over reacting!

2) If people didn't have unregistered guns and arsenals in their homes these days, the police wouldn't have to do what they did. Once again....this was after major natural disasters.

3 )How do I know that Obama doesn't want your crappy guns? Because he has stated his views over and over and over again. Because he has not done one thing since he was elected to show that he is even THINKING of doing so. Common sense, man....common sense!

4) I have talked to several Canadians and they can't believe that there are so many people against health care reform. They said that it works beautifully and that you can walk out of a hospital there, after having quadruple bypass surgery, and not pay a dime. They pay something like $36.00 a month for their care. This same woman had to go to a hospital here to get her blood pressure under control. Obviously, she doesn't have insurance coverage when she visits here every year. Cost? $6,000! She said that she has never had to wait in line.

"Tea bagger"...potty mouth? THEY NAMED THEMSELVES! You reap what you sow.

  • 2 votes
#1.11 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:30 PM EDT
thomassino

Not only are we going to force you to pay for health insurance, but since the health insurance companies are going to acquire a windfall of profits from the 45million NEWLY insured, we are going to allow them to jack up your rates to continually increase their profitability...

And Americans WILL be controlled:

Health care should be similar to a vote: if you are a convicted felon, you should be denied...

Jaywalkers, speeders, smokers, drinkers, and sports afficianado's are at increased risk for injury and need to be denied any health care, or face increased premiums.

Preexisting conditions cannot be denied, but they can be charged MORE.

  • 5 votes
#1.12 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:36 PM EDT
tweetheart44

thomassino, That is not fact. Have you ever heard of competition? The insurance companies, up to this point, have acted in a way similar to a monopoly. They all get together, decide how much money they can take for a particular service, and then charge the same high price. See, right now, we don't have a choice. Prices go down when there is competition. It is a shame that we can't buy insurance from the government because many independent insurance companies would have had to drop their prices dramatically.

Get over your "control" hysteria.

If you think that smokers, etc. should be denied, then why isn't that they way it is right now? The new bill doesn't change things like that. There are always going to be stupid people who use drugs, smoke, over eat, etc. That's the way it is.

Some day you are going to be glad that this is the new law. Mark my words.

  • 1 vote
#1.13 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:59 PM EDT
Greg Johnson-900798

This is shocking! Who could have foreseen that the healthcare bill was really about controlling our lives and not healthcare?

  • 7 votes
#1.14 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:24 PM EDT
CliffDogg

they don't need your guns, because (1) they own you already (2) you wouldn't stand a chance with small arms (3) you're too valuable as a slave and servant to their advertising messages from their corporate/political/military complex.

  • 4 votes
#1.15 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:59 PM EDT
TheKay

It is a shame that we can't buy insurance from the government because many independent insurance companies would have had to drop their prices dramatically.

Based on what research will the insurance companies drop their prices - they have absolutely no reason - The government has just handed them millions of new customers? Currently, I pay 12,000 a year for health insurance - but I do not see anything in this new law that will help lower the costs.

  • 7 votes
#1.16 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:04 PM EDT
Lkessler

Rickace: I will admit, Pelosi as the Borg Queen is an actual improvement to her looks! *lmao!*

  • 5 votes
#1.17 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:17 PM EDT
tweetheart44

TheKay, I am willing to bet that they will drop. Time will tell.

  • 1 vote
#1.18 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:32 PM EDT
backroads

Dingell's remark should not come as a surprise.

  • 5 votes
#1.19 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:25 PM EDT
Socrates1

Why would the prices drop?

  • 6 votes
#1.20 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:16 PM EDT
tweetheart44

Competition. Remember when they put an end to the phone company monopoly many years ago. Look how the cell phone and Internet companies are competing these days! Same thing will happen with insurance.

    #1.21 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:03 PM EDT
    psychokiller

    Excellent, LOL. She never looked better.

    • 1 vote
    #1.22 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:53 PM EDT
    Socrates1

    tweet...I'll take that bet.

    ps..the phone companies were monopolies heavily regulated by the government. Prices dropped when the government deregulated the industry and became much less involved. See a inverse parallel here?

    • 4 votes
    #1.23 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:32 PM EDT
    Neale Osborn

    Does this surprise you?? THe goal has ALWAYS been to control the American people, and milk them until they think being milked is necessary. MMMOOOOOOOOOOO! (The new call of the American people)

    • 4 votes
    #1.24 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:23 PM EDT
    rickace

    Lucy

    Rickace: I will admit, Pelosi as the Borg Queen is an actual improvement to her looks! *lmao!*

    If nothing else it makes her look younger ;-)

    • 4 votes
    #1.25 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:52 PM EDT
    rickace

    tweetheart44

    1) You act like these two incidences is the beginning of your "wonderful world of guns" being taken away. Talk about over reacting!

    I'm not overreacting. I'm just concerned. Maybe you wipe your ass with the Constitution, but I take it very seriously. When the government starts infringing upon rights and no one cares, they'll do it more and more. If the feds and NG come to your neighborhood one day, you'll get the message. Maybe.

    2) If people didn't have unregistered guns and arsenals in their homes these days, the police wouldn't have to do what they did.

    Say what? They HAD to do what they did? Did you even bother to read those two articles I linked? There was no justification for what they did. The people weren't engaging in criminal behavior.

    Once again....this was after major natural disasters.

    There's nothing in the Second or Fourth Amendments about natural disasters. Again you demonstrate your unfamiliarity with the law of the land.

    3 )How do I know that Obama doesn't want your crappy guns? Because he has stated his views over and over and over again.

    Q: How do you know when a politician is lying?
    A: His lips are moving.

    Q: How do you know when a lawyer is lying?
    A: His lips are moving.

    Come on now. He's a crooked, self-serving politician. Do you really trust him? I sure as hell don't.

    Because he has not done one thing since he was elected to show that he is even THINKING of doing so.

    He doesn't have to. I don't remember Bush signaling anything prior to those two events that went down on his watch. And unless he's rescinded NSDP51 and HSDP20 they're still on the books. They make the Patriot Act look tame by comparison.

    4) I have talked to several Canadians and they can't believe that there are so many people against health care reform.

    That's because what the Dems passed isn't health care reform to a system as the Canadians know it. The Canadians aren't familiar enough with the legislation to render an informed opinion.

    "Tea bagger"...potty mouth?

    Why, yes.

    THEY NAMED THEMSELVES!

    The hell they did. It's called the Tea Party Movement, named after the Boston Tea Party. Some progressive perv renamed it to tea bagger and that spread. Here are a few definitions so you'll know what you're saying when you say it.

    You reap what you sow.

    All they're reaping is a lot of bull@!$%# from the left side of the aisle. The protest on Sunday was a waste, but nevertheless they came from all around the nation. People from all walks of life, judges, business owners, and yeah some rednecks. Meanwhile over in peace-loving hippieville Berkeley, CA, students are rioting, vandalizing, assaulting police officers with metal projectiles, and engaging in arson. When progressives are as concerned and peaceful as the Tea Partiers are, get back to me.

    • 5 votes
    #1.26 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:33 PM EDT
    Reply
    Jimster

    Breitbart? Fail.

    I want to see the FULL clip of what Dingle said, Not a clip that is edited right after the "control the people" statement.

    Really, this is Dine Store propaganda at best. I expect there will be a full clip available today, as the RW echo chamber is fully geared up. Just Google - "Rep Dingle control" and you'll see what I mean.

    You'd have to be stupid to believe this with the evidence you've provided.

    • 7 votes
    Reply#2 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:27 AM EDT
    rickace

    Jimster

    You'd have to be stupid to believe this with the evidence you've provided.

    You'd have to be stupid to believe this POS legislation crafted by power-crazed, corrupt, and self-serving Democrats will actually improve health care for Americans.

    • 22 votes
    #2.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:18 AM EDT
    Johnny Yuma

    You can find the whole thing here...
    Congressman John Dingell tells Paul W. Smith he is thrilled with the passage of the health care bill.

    The quote in question comes up at around the 6:00 minute mark.

    • 9 votes
    #2.2 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:18 AM EDT
    AlexandraJolicoeur

    JY, i listened to that clip... jimster, it wasn't taken out of context. have a listen

    The sentiment does not surprise me, as it comes from a mindset that believes since the people need to be taken care of, government control is a good, necessary and even compassionate thing. In reality, government control begets government control, and the very government which "knows best" is comprised of the same people it desires to subjugate. You certainly don't know what's best for yourself, your family, your life; but the government does.

    • 13 votes
    #2.3 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:53 AM EDT
    TopJedi

    Johnny thank you for the contextual link.

    Alexandra thank you for the confirmation.

    • 8 votes
    #2.4 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:59 AM EDT
    Brian-497171

    Um, Gingrich compared it to the Civil Rights legislation saying, ""They [health reform] will destroy their party much as Lyndon Johnson shattered the Democratic Party for 40 years with the enactment of civil rights legislation in the 1960s"

    Yeah, he views the Civil Rights laws as wrong????

    Judd Gregg compared this bill to an asteroid hitting the Earth.

    Really, Judd?

    These are small men with dubious intentions.

    • 8 votes
    #2.5 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:13 PM EDT
    TopJedi

    Brian what did Biden call it? LOL

    Dubious intentions seems to be the prerequisite for public office these days. Exaggerated analogies are much different and obviously less harmful than coercive vote garnering (to put it nicely).

    • 9 votes
    #2.6 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:27 PM EDT
    Reply
    A. Macarthur

    He never said the word "Obamacare" and we never actually saw who was speaking, and we don't know what was said in the rest of the interview.

    I will look for the full context.

    Keep in mind the Breitbart/O'Keefe frauds.

    A. Mac

    • 9 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:41 AM EDT
    TopJedi

    He never said the word "Obamacare" and we never actually saw who was speaking, and we don't know what was said in the rest of the interview.

    Here's my guess on the context: "I have been inserting mind-altering-chips in breakfast cereal and running water for 15 years now as part of the misappropriated defense spending. Here we are in 2010 and we finally can active the chips under a medical program that will totally 'control the people'."

    LOL... am I close?

    • 11 votes
    #3.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:45 AM EDT
    A. Macarthur

    Fair is fair; Representative Dingle, in an interview with Ed Shultz, said ...

    "Yes, I said it, I goofed."

    He then explained that he did not mean to say "control people," rather control the logistics of the program."

    A. Mac

    • 1 vote
    #3.2 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:17 AM EDT
    TopJedi

    I'm still holding out for Obama to make similar admissions...

    "I didn't mean to make 'care' mandatory, compulsory, and so full of fees err taxes..."

    "I didn't know it couldn't possibly be the LARGEST reduction of the deficit in History..."

    • 5 votes
    #3.3 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:27 PM EDT
    mrsrachelm

    Fair is fair; Representative Dingle, in an interview with Ed Shultz, said ...

    "Yes, I said it, I goofed."

    He then explained that he did not mean to say "control people," rather control the logistics of the program."

    A. Mac

    Ummm yeeeaaahh, the two sayings are so similar. I can see just how easy it would be to mistake them, LOL. NOT!

    • 3 votes
    #3.4 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:31 AM EDT
    Reply
    JAKE THE SNAKE-382028

    You think people now aren't controlled by healthcare now. I know a few people who want to look for a new job but can't because the health insurance they have at their job is good and they don't want to risk it.

    • 6 votes
    Reply#4 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:38 AM EDT
    rkymtnwoman

    exactly Jake

    The insurance company and our corporate employers are our masters. The insurance companies make life and death decisions about us every day. That is, those of us who have insurance.

    The rest of us are "self-pay" and that is a treatment plan of dismissal and avoidance.

    Many Americans die every day simply because of the fear of the cost of treatment.

    In the USA we have a caste system of health care. VIP, insured, "self-pay"

    • 5 votes
    #4.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:42 AM EDT
    TopJedi

    Many Americans die every day simply because of the fear of the cost of treatment

    Many more are dying every hour just from the fear of your next comment. Don't try to control me rkymtnwoman. LOL

    • 10 votes
    #4.2 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:47 AM EDT
    rickace

    TopJedi

    rkymtnwoman has a valid point, at least in my case. The treatment I require is egregiously expensive, nearly $1,000/day as an inpatient. Further as I've discovered I always relapse.

    Without a job and without insurance I'm in the "self-pay" caste and have been forced to pay from my retirement accounts. $25,000 alone last year, to get a brief respite and discover first-hand what a racket this one facility was running.

    I wish the damned feds would refund all the SS and Medicare money they extorted from me during my working years. With interest.

    As if!

    • 7 votes
    #4.3 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:54 PM EDT
    janice22

    Rickace, do you believe the treatment you need would be available at all under this newly passed health care bill? Isn't that why people come to the US from other countries because we have treatments that aren't available under their publicly run healthcare systems.

    • 1 vote
    #4.4 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:01 PM EDT
    janice22

    I know a few people who want to look for a new job but can't because the health insurance they have at their job is good and they don't want to risk it.

    And I know a few people who would like to live in Hawaii.....

    • 5 votes
    #4.5 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:05 PM EDT
    TopJedi

    rkymtnwoman has a valid point, at least in my case.

    Here's what rkmtnwoman wrote and what I am speaking toward:

    Many Americans die every day simply because of the fear of the cost of treatment.

    If Americans are dying simply from the fear of cost, then imagine how many more are dying from the fear of our National Debt!!

    The fear of the cost is not really the reason people are dying or we would be setting up "Government Fear Centers" to treat people for National Debt Trama. Maybe that's coming LOL.

    Otherwise I do reasonably understand your point. Remember that $$ Billions in Hospital spending shows that many unregistered illegals do not share that same FEAR of cost at present.

    • 7 votes
    #4.6 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:57 PM EDT
    rickace

    janice22

    Rickace, do you believe the treatment you need would be available at all under this newly passed health care bill?

    I couldn't say, but since it hasn't been effective maybe it doesn't even matter.

    TopJedi

    If Americans are dying simply from the fear of cost, then imagine how many more are dying from the fear of our National Debt!!

    You're preaching to the choir there :-) Sadly I have no children of my own, but at least I won't die knowing they'll be stuck with the tab for all this malfeasance.

    Remember that $$ Billions in Hospital spending shows that many unregistered illegals do not share that same FEAR of cost at present.

    Either they're multi-millionaires like Pelosi and Obama, or next to broke. I figure the latter.

    • 4 votes
    #4.7 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:57 PM EDT
    TopJedi

    Thanks Rick! No intention to preach to the choir, probably singing some of your tunes already!

    • 1 vote
    #4.8 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:53 PM EDT
    rickace

    TopJedi

    The situation is far more perilous than most Americans (and I'm sure just about everyone in Washington) suspect. There are major cracks developing in our financial system, along the lines of those that brought the bailouts in 2008. I have no idea what $12 trillion in debt combined with an economic collapse will bring about, but you can bet your bippie it will be tumultuous. If they know of it at all, the media naturally keep this stuff off the air until it's too late for it to be useful because it's not juicy and doesn't raise the Nielsens.

    Across the pond, the EU is coming under financial fire too, and some of the centuries-old tensions are emerging again. Remember where WWI and WWII originated. In good times they're huggy-kissy, but as conditions sour the fences go up and hostilities emerge.

    • 4 votes
    #4.9 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:12 PM EDT
    Reply
    onevoiceamongmany

    Yes the whole clip is quite different. Thanks for being a manipulative journalist breitbart.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#5 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
    AlexandraJolicoeur

    no, the statement about controlling the people was not out of context, one voice. Nor was the entire 12+ minute clip about controlling the people, overall it was the congressman's view and reasoning for this legislation. But- the statement about "controlling the people" was not taken out of context, as nothing which followed it did ANYTHING to clarify the statement to not mean exactly what it sounded like.

    damn.

    • 17 votes
    #5.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:22 PM EDT
    TopJedi

    Thank you Alexandra, it seems to some that context is simply a matter of subjective personal context - assuming that the 6 minute statement was even heard before making their judgment.

    • 11 votes
    #5.2 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:31 PM EDT
    AlexandraJolicoeur

    tks jedi- sometimes i get a little frustrated when the obvious, the logical flies completely over heads. especially heads that are planning on becoming teachers...

    • 9 votes
    #5.3 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:35 PM EDT
    janice22

    the logical flies completely over heads.

    With some, it's so far above their heads it doesn't even ruffle their hair.

    • 1 vote
    #5.4 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:10 PM EDT
    Reply
    jeffcisme

    There is a problem with the title: It is not "Shocking" audio. It is what I expect to hear from the "progressives."

    • 13 votes
    Reply#6 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:36 PM EDT
    TopJedi

    True. Sadly true.

    • 13 votes
    #6.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
    Reply
    billy-witchdoctor-com

    Shocking News...it does control people....

    Try telling the Government you dont want to buy healthcare and see what happens!

    • 10 votes
    Reply#7 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:47 PM EDT
    Dame Quixote

    Agreed. It already controls you.

    • 6 votes
    #7.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:44 PM EDT
    Reply
    demo scout

    Breitbart is a proven liar and uses deceptive editing to create his propaganda. He probably got this tape from that weeny fake pimp who is facing prison for his escapade at Mary Landrieu's office.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#8 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:52 PM EDT
    TopJedi

    Ok demo - thank you for your unsolicited disclaimer. What say you about the actual content recorded from Dingell's mouth?

    • 15 votes
    #8.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:57 PM EDT
    Reply
    Moderate-514640

    OOps Someone let the cat out of the bag. Of course many on the left will be in denial.

    • 16 votes
    Reply#9 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:56 PM EDT
    Dame Quixote

    Case in point from #8:

    Breitbart is a proven liar and uses deceptive editing to create his propaganda. He probably got this tape from that weeny fake pimp who is facing prison for his escapade at Mary Landrieu's office.

    • 6 votes
    #9.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:45 PM EDT
    Reply
    SpoxLogic

    Er, maybe I'm missing something. But, can someone please tell me how my getting access to cheaper health insurance is going to control my life or freedom any more than... like say, ..I dunno... the Patriot Act does?

    Maybe we should be more worried about those kinds of laws that actually gave the govt more power than necessary to actually put your butt in jail, than worry about a law designed to just level the playing field when it comes to getting health care.

    Also, after listening to the full tape, one sentence out of several minutes of interviewing didn't make it as ominous as Brietbart or anyone else tries to make it. I even tried prepping my mind to be in a paranoid state by the time it got to that part, and still no effect.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#10 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:03 PM EDT
    Socrates1

    Er..I'm assuming that you are in favor of the Patriot Act.

    You are incorrect in assuming that all those who are against the Health Insurance Scam are somehow for the Patriot Act.

    • 8 votes
    #10.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
    AlexandraJolicoeur

    Spox, perhaps you are.

    What I see in this is the proverbial slippery slope; as this HCR bill now gives the federal government the ability to compel it's citizenry to purchase something (presumably for their own good) it sets precedent and opens the door for further governmental compulsion.

    • 7 votes
    #10.2 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
    mtherof3

    designed to just level the playing field when it comes to getting health care.

    unless you are a member of congress.

    And it's leveling insurance not access to health care. Let's at least be clear on that.

    • 4 votes
    #10.3 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:41 PM EDT
    Dame Quixote

    But, can someone please tell me how my getting access to cheaper health insurance is going to control my life or freedom any more than... like say, ..I dunno... the Patriot Act does?

    You mean the one just extended?

    • 7 votes
    #10.4 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:47 PM EDT
    rickace

    SpoxLogic

    But, can someone please tell me how my getting access to cheaper health insurance

    You should think for yourself and not swallow the BS that flows from the mouths of Obama and Pelosi. The enactment of this legislation was tainted by $$$ in graft, back room dealmaking, legislative arm-twisting by Speaker Pelosi, and a complete disregard for the will of the people. In my district, 59% of the voters were opposed to the bill. What did our @!$%#stick Democratic rep do? He voted Yea.

    Like 'em or not, the Tea Partiers had made valid points. Did Congress care? Hell no!

    Here's a little peek at the level of graft. The data ended at July of last year, so it's safe to assume more money flowed into Baucus's war chest since then.

    The Democrats didn't pass this bill to help the people. They passed it to fatten their campaign funds and then they had to pay back Aetna, Merck, et al. with favorable treatment for their firms in the legislation. As Dr. Price said in committee, this bill will destroy health care in this nation.

    Maybe you will have access to cheaper insurance. Without timely access to competent care, all the insurance in the world will not avail you.

    • 8 votes
    #10.5 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:09 PM EDT
    SpoxLogic

    it sets precedent and opens the door for further governmental compulsion.

    alexandra, how does this open the door? What else will they force us to buy. Cigarettes? Guns? Meat, if you are a vegetarian? Veggies, if you are a meat-eater? Please note, we already pay thousands of dollars to help treat the uninsured. But, you are right, forcing us to buy something we don't want is a slippery slope.

    Maybe instead of mandating it and taxing you if you don't buy it, the government should force you to pay the ER and hospital bills, if you opted out of getting insurance and then got injured. And if you can't pay, force you to work it off in a labor camp. Would that be a better idea?

    Rickface, show me one law that wasn't passed with some sort of back door dealings? I am not that naive to believe this was the first one. It might be the only one the GOP politicians are griping over, but all the others had their share of deals. Also, show me where there is timely access to competent care right now. Or are you wanting me to believe that you will stop getting urgent or emergency care because HCR passed?

    Socrates, you are wrong. I never assumed that people who oppose HCR are somehow for the Patriot Act. I'm just saying the Patriot Act gives the Govt the powere to make you disappear without any recourse, and folks aren't getting all bent out of shape over it.

    and Dame Quixote, yes, I definitely mean the one that was extended (I know where you want to go with your line of question). The Patriot Act scares me no matter who the POTUS. The current POTUS might not make it any more insidious, but what if we get someone with the mindset like the folks on the Texas Board of Ed? Very, very scary.

    and mtherof3, please spare me that comment. HCR is designed so that if you are happy with your current health insurance, you don't need to change. It is not designed to replace what you already have, so there is no need to exempt one group, when that is not the purpose. Basically, any one happy with their current insurance plan is exempt!

    • 1 vote
    #10.6 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:32 PM EDT
    ConstitutionThumper

    It may not be so devious yet, but this will set precedent. Right now, you have a choice. Ten years from now, perhaps that choice will be deemed as too "costly" to the government and so will be eliminated.

    To say nothing of the inefficient way that government handles all of its business, the way I see government-controlled health care, excuse me if this sounds paranoid, is as one of the most insidious ways possible to enslave the very bodies of the citizenry while claiming they are providing a service. More life choices will be scrutinized by the government, deemed unhealthy and costly to the taxpayer, and will carry financial punishments or possibly jail time... or maybe just a denial of coverage for those ailments deemed to have been preventable by following established "guidelines for healthy living."

    As it is now, cigarette smokers (just one example) are maligned because the health problems they face later in life require expensive medical care (along with second hand smoke concerns, extrapolated to hysterical proportions). Obese people, or just overweight people "defined" as obese, are beginning to become similarly targeted by the media and those "who care." These are two very significant groups of people, and who knows how many others will be identified and targeted... or even just "created" by propaganda. And, as an extension of this, any and all causes of these real or manufactured concerns will be targeted by legislation to limit the risk that people will make unhealthy choices (think trans fat bans, tanning booth taxes, "sin" taxes taken to the limits of what people can bear).

    If the government takes this health care reformation to the extreme that some people want, then the only people who will be covered will be the "healthy" ones who do what the government tells them to, how, and when they are told to. Everyone else will be punished in some way, even though they have paid into the system themselves, because they are draining money away from those contributors who are "healthy" and "deserving" of the taxpayer money.

    This could be disastrous in so many ways. Freedom has already been knifed in the back by the Patriot Act, the Controlled Substances Act, numerous Supreme Court decisions and Executive Orders, and the general atmosphere of submission to those in the corporate and government world who think they have the right to put profit, GDP, and their "careers" above individual sovereignty (or, at the very least, individual autonomy). This health care thing, to me, is an extension of all of that, and is the crushing of the head of individual liberty.

    Republicans and democrats bicker and fight about all of this, but really each side fits the other, like they are keyed together to materialize the demonization, helplessness, and servitude of the individual through the negation of individual choice and right to self-determination. Freedom has been killed to "protect" us... next WE will be killed to "protect" us...

    • 3 votes
    #10.7 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:44 PM EDT
    Socrates1

    So you are against the Patriot Act and for this Health Scam? For me there's an inconsistency.

    Why does the bill need separate funding? Why aren't we all just covered as citizens?

    • 1 vote
    #10.8 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:49 PM EDT
    TopJedi

    The logic of this debate misses the fact that the primary constitutional founding purpose of the Federal Government is primarily to Protect its citizens from foreign and domestic threats.

    Only recently has such protection been interpreted to include regulation of the sugar content in Elementary School soda cans. This week it has become a compulsary membership into Federal medical coverage with an undisclosed purchase price yet to be enforced by the IRS.

    • 9 votes
    #10.9 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:12 PM EDT
    mtherof3

    HCR is designed so that if you are happy with your current health insurance, you don't need to change. It is not designed to replace what you already have, so there is no need to exempt one group, when that is not the purpose.

    I am perfectly happy with my coverage. Cash pay. NO insurance. I do need to change.

    Basically, any one happy with their current insurance plan is exempt!

    No. They will pay a tax/fine.

    • 4 votes
    #10.10 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:27 PM EDT
    AlexandraJolicoeur

    spox-

    the door opened is government control via mandates and compulsion to obey those mandates via penalties (taxation). It's not just about forcing you to buy something, but also allowing you NOT to buy something because the government has deemed it unsafe, unhealthy, etc... the precedent is not merely giving congress the ability to force it's citizenry to buy something, it's the ability to congress to force you do to ANYTHING they deem good for the "general welfare" in it's most broad definition.

    • 7 votes
    #10.11 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:48 PM EDT
    Neale Osborn

    spox- HERE'S how it opens the door- People like, oh, late's say.... you start bitching in 2 or 3 years that "This purchase mandate is too big a strain on my finances! WAAHHH! Help, me Democrat Congress, you are my only hope!" Congress says "Well, the mandate didn't work, so it's time for SINGLE PAYER! We'll just put the insurance companies totally out of business, and TOTALLY control healthcare in the US. And now, there isn't even a US out there to go to to get healthcare if you don't like it our way (like Canadians do right now!)."

    Of course, since most reform supporters are whining that there isn't just a single-payer in the bill, this is a good thing to them, NOT a dangerous precedent, but the REST of us know the truth.

    • 6 votes
    #10.12 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:25 PM EDT
    rickace

    SpoxLogic

    Rickface, show me one law that wasn't passed with some sort of back door dealings? I am not that naive to believe this was the first one.

    So you're condoning this? That's reprehensible. This law will affect health care across the nation and put people at risk of sickness and death. The Dems were serving themselves and probably the suits in Big Pharma, the insurance and HMO industries and anyone else who bribed them enough. That's not stuff you want to air on C-SPAN.

    It might be the only one the GOP politicians are griping over, but all the others had their share of deals.

    That's not the topic. Don't Obama me and try to change the subject like he tried to pull in that interview a few weeks ago.

    Also, show me where there is timely access to competent care right now.

    My family practice office and my former one on Long Island for openers. Fortunately since 2002 I've had no need for emergency access and will gladly make an appointment a few weeks in advance for stuff that can be scheduled.

    Or are you wanting me to believe that you will stop getting urgent or emergency care because HCR passed?

    Good question. I can't say for sure what will happen in this neck of the woods, but already problems are developing. A cable reporter interviewed an M.D. today who said she was going to a cash-only system for payments. She didn't want some indifferent bureaucrat deciding the course of treatment for her patients. Who could blame her?

    BTW for us without insurance emergency care here is outrageously expensive, as it was on Long Island. I don't see ObamaCare improving that for me.

    The feds are not your friends as the president and the speaker would led you to believe.

    • 3 votes
    #10.13 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:01 PM EDT
    Reply
    mtherof3

    the audacity of power. thoughts on claiming control of the people.

    • 5 votes
    Reply#11 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:06 PM EDT
    Partisan Hack

    Care to provide what Dingell said AFTER this little clip? Obviously he was talking about the complexities of putting together a new system to help people.

    I think that the headline on another clip on this far right site says it all "Does health care law signal U.S. empire decline?" That's what this is really about - the corporatists being worried that THEY are losing control over American democratic institutions. It creeping corporatism that has been eating away at American freedoms and dignity. If you're afraid when a majority of duly elected representatives of the people do something to serve the vast majority of Americans fairly, then you're afraid of democracy. Which, sadly, seems to be the case for many Americans.

      Reply#12 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:11 PM EDT
      TopJedi

      Care to provide what Dingell said AFTER this little clip?

      Certainly: "Once we control the people, then we will control the animals, then we will try to control everything that moves until there is not even an insect in America that can live without our benefits."

      "This will be the greatest deficit reduction package in the history of America!!"

      I might have exaggerated a little about the insects, LOL

      • 14 votes
      #12.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:17 PM EDT
      mrsrachelm

      Jedi, Alexadra and rickace:

      You guys are my heros! Keep saying it like is is guys!

      • 6 votes
      #12.2 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:48 AM EDT
      rickace

      mrsrachelm

      You guys are my heros! Keep saying it like is is guys!

      What a delightful compliment to wake up to!

      Friend request sent.

      TopJedi

      I might have exaggerated a little about the insects, LOL

      Yeah, insects are uncontrollable. Last fall there was a SWARM of ladybugs in my neck of the woods, the likes of which I'd never seen before. By the time I'd caught on, several hundred had made their way through small unsealed spaces around an air conditioner into the upstairs where I dwell. We spent 15 minutes or so sucking them up with a vacuum cleaner but naturally didn't get them all. To this day some remain. When one lands on my window, I scoop it up onto a piece of paper and set it free outside.

      Ladybugs rock. They look cool, they don't pester humans, and they eat other bugs. Really now, what more could one ask for? :-}

      • 3 votes
      #12.3 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:29 AM EDT
      AlexandraJolicoeur

      thanks mrsrachelm!

      oh, and ladybugs are also good luck if they land on your or get in your house (not a lot, but the lone one...)

      • 2 votes
      #12.4 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:47 PM EDT
      TopJedi

      Yes good going to all our friends!

      • 1 vote
      #12.5 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:47 PM EDT
      Reply
      whiskers64

      Duh go figure. Dingell is a fool but unfortunately wields power right now. November will turn the tides and the socialists will be kicked out just as they were in 94.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#13 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:36 PM EDT
      Susan-649485

      The entire sentence says something about changing the health care system for 300 Americans.

      300 Americans? Really? Do you all believe that, too?

      This entire sentence was one big misspeak.

      I'm sure he meant to say something about the process (since he actually was talking about the process).

      To say that this flubbed up sentence is proof of anything is the equivalent of saying that there are going to be FEMA concentration camps for protesters or that Bush masterminded 9/11.

      The only thing shocking about any of it is that there are actually people who believe that there are FEMA concentration camps and that Bush really did mastermind 9/11.

        Reply#14 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:47 PM EDT
        TopJedi

        Susan - Well the other shocking thing if it is entirely a flub (and contextually it is clearly not), is that so many liberals DO believe they need to control Americans because we're collectively too stupid to know what's best for us. Too Dumb to Fail... the new Gov mantra.

        You don't have to look for 9/11 FEMA camps to see daily the strong sentiment from liberals who want MORE and MORE government control in their lives.

        • 5 votes
        #14.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:05 PM EDT
        Susan-649485

        You think it isn't a flub contextually?

        Pfffttt! I won't even bother reading the rest of your post.

        BTW, if I did read the rest of it, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be all in an uproar because only 300 Americans are a part of health care reform.

          #14.2 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:14 PM EDT
          TopJedi

          Susan, I'm picturing your thumbs in your ears and your fingers wiggling at me. Try to see how Dingells comments flow with the whole 12 minute commentary not just a mistake about 300 people.

          • 6 votes
          #14.3 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:22 PM EDT
          Susan-649485

          LOL.

          I did listen to the whole thing.

          I didn't hear anything indicating that we are in danger from our government.

          Could you please tell me what you hear that frightens you?

          And I mean specifics. Not some generalized Chicken-Little- the-sky-is-falling-weird-stuff.

          Cause that Chicken-Little-the-sky-is-falling-weird-stuff is all that I hear from the opponents of health care reform.

          How about something different?

          Dazzle me with your logic and facts.

            #14.4 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:07 PM EDT
            AlexandraJolicoeur

            Could you please tell me what you hear that frightens you?

            A representative that says (and this is verbatim)

            "It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people"

            I think that sentiment, the kind of mindset which views government control over the personal choices of it's citizenry as good, noble and just is unnerving to many.

            I'm curious, Susan, why it does not bother you that a congressman sees nothing wrong with "controlling the people"?

            Furthermore, SPECIFICALLY, what bothers me is the precedent set by the government mandate that i must purchase a good/service (simply by virtue of the fact that I exist) or face a penalty. I'm not sure compulsion is constitutional; perhaps you see my concern?

            • 9 votes
            #14.5 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:34 PM EDT
            Susan-649485

            So why is it that the only person who bothers to reply is already on my ignore list?

            I'm guessing that it's because there just isn't a lot of logic or facts to draw upon.

              #14.6 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:42 PM EDT
              TopJedi

              Susan you are being petty. You have received numerous thoughtful answers and yet you have mentioned you would not read further those responses once you came to something you didn't agree with.

              I am wondering why you have not put everyone who disagrees with you on your growing ignore list. Some of us don't "bother" to respond because we are away from our computers and because we have already answered thoughtfully despite your tone and insolence.

              • 9 votes
              #14.7 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:12 PM EDT
              Susan-649485

              My growing ignore list?

              Perhaps you are referring to the "thoughtful" answer from another Newsviner that I put on my ignore list today.

              You know, the one who called our president a "muslim pig".

              And no, you didn't actually answer my question.

                #14.8 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:42 PM EDT
                AlexandraJolicoeur

                Susan,

                I'm curious, why am I on your ignore list? I don't believe we've ever interacted.

                • 3 votes
                #14.9 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:24 PM EDT
                TopJedi

                Susan, I am not referring to anything you have done elsewhere. I don't know you from any exchange but what I am reading here. You stated you were ignoring someone on this thread and that you would not read further my previous response and explanation to you. This looks to me like a growing list of ignoring others whether you push the little button or not.

                I have already expressed in many ways that I don't like what Dingell has said or the prevailing view that is espoused by many other liberals as well. You said it was just a flub, I disagree. There is nothing more to logically discuss with you on this subject.

                • 6 votes
                #14.10 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:56 PM EDT
                Reply
                Fifth Horseman

                I wonder if government dogs will have body guards for the rest of his life and those of theirfamily, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, ect. In many countries that fall under government control the top dogs and their off spring have government body guards. 24/7. They is one thing government officials have to fear is that their numbers in Congress could drop one weekend if only a hundred citizens decided to committe suicide and take a hack with them. During the war of 1776 against the British,American rebels did just that. King George government officials were the targets, so was the members of their families as well as friends of the British. Death squads were employed by both sides. A Hell of a bloody mess.

                Then there was those who took advantage of the war by taking out both sides, just to keep the bad situation from solving itself.

                I would hate to be a friend of Rep. Dingell especially if President Obama gets his way. President Obama could order Rep. Dingell taken out to the wood shed and given a wripping.

                  Reply#15 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:12 PM EDT
                  SpoxLogic

                  WTR?? (Whrot the Ruck??) done with your best Scooby-Doo impersonation.

                  • 1 vote
                  #15.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:39 PM EDT
                  Neale Osborn

                  Horseman- please learn to spell- you re-inforce the "ignorant redneck idiot"label the left paints us ALL with. Spelling and punctuation are NOT useless things, nor are they to be ignored. "It is better to keep your mouth closed and have people think you a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." Please, spell check the comments before posting them. We don't need the bad press.

                  • 1 vote
                  #15.2 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:33 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  orange-756308

                  Great, more GOP craziness. God, this is now just starting to get sad...

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#16 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:19 PM EDT
                  TopJedi

                  When 59% of Americans are OPPOSED to the WHOLE bill (not the happy select portions of it) and now 80% of Americans believe this will not help our long term economic situation it becomes very likely you will hear much more from those you chose to ignore in the days ahead.

                  • 7 votes
                  #16.1 - Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:14 PM EDT
                  rickace

                  orange-756308

                  Great, more GOP craziness.

                  Ummm, no. Wrong party. It wasn't the GOP that saddled us this this crazy POS legislation.

                  I hope that clears things up for you.

                  • 5 votes
                  #16.2 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:03 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  ma91744-1401618

                  Religions also wants to control the people.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#17 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:16 PM EDT
                  TopJedi

                  Power corrupts, Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

                  • 5 votes
                  #17.1 - Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:22 PM EDT
                  mrsrachelm

                  How did we segue from the Dingell quote to religion bashing? Did I miss something somewhere?

                  A tad off topic, isn't it?

                  • 2 votes
                  #17.2 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:56 AM EDT
                  TopJedi

                  Distraction, off-topics, and ramblings do frequently make their way onto my threads, especially when I speaking out against Obama and his style of leadership.

                  • 2 votes
                  #17.3 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:48 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  rebel-conf

                  bring it on dingle control youll never control americans just try it.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#18 - Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:33 AM EDT
                  Leave a Comment:
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                  (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                  Newsvine Privacy Statement
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                  FUN STUFF:
                  • Leaderboard |
                  • E-Mail Alerts |
                  • Top of the Vine |
                  • Newsvine Live |
                  • Newsvine Archives |
                  • The Greenhouse |
                  COMPANY STUFF:
                  • Code of Honor |
                  • Company Info |
                  • Contact Us |
                  • Jobs |
                  • User Agreement |
                  • Privacy Policy |
                  • About our ads
                  LEGAL STUFF:
                  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com